The ten teams have qualified for the WCG Finals next week, however it's not yet certain if we'll actually see these exact teams compete due to the poor timing of WCG finals.
So far GUTS have already declined their invite whilst VHM are still undecided. The reason was due to the late notice WCG had forced upon the teams putting them in a bad financial situation to secure flights, accommodation, and leave.
we are not accepting the invite in Protest of A) matthew burton's disguisting behavior today B) Poor administration decisions on the day C) CBN planning being outrageously terrible D) Paying 30 dollars for 3 games of cs because one person had to leave because they had other commitments E) My 3 hour drive home after playing 3 games with no chance of getting an autobirth because the structure of the comp was changed to suit one person after the group stages ended, and for that matter not completed properly in the first place
I heard gomez said at the start of the comp it's top2 playing for auto, then unpro (the player from your team) said no it's top4. Communication error by administrators.
Incorrect, chris said he was not admining 3 times yesterday. It was also made completely CLEAR at the star of the day it was top4 (Qlimax was also aware of this and jim is not on their team). and to cap the logic train off, you cant have 4 teams playing for 3 prizes without all teams actually having a chance for playing for prizes. iM had a chance to play for 1st seed, burton had a chance at defending 1st seed, we had no oppurtunity to attack 2nd seed and we only had the choice of defending 4th seed, when groups decided the outcomes fully. So Why have a final anyway???? it was purely to appease one player who had to leave, who for that matter knew fair well that lan was not going to end by 4:30 especially when we dont start till 11:30 because the server box is locked.
Also im going to defend jim here, at no point does jim do anything with regards to admining cs comps for personal gain. Jim would make a call based on the common sense at the time, which yesterday was ignored by people whose interests were best served by doing their own thing (yes they lived the game themselves before discussions had concluded because they had a player leaving). In my view finals where never played as they weren't actually finals, either the finals have to be replayed or you take the standings from groups, burtons team getting the auto. This really should be fixed by the community, because really it stinks and teams should not be rewarded for being fuckheads or at next lan comp i will rock up when i feel like, win one game, leave because i got shit to do? and claim entitlements to win the whole competition.
Ah and to rub it in burtons team do not even play out the bo3 final they rushed into they threw in the towel after the first map.... denying everyone else from a chance they signed up for.
I think having a round robin of 5 teams then top4 ... out of 5.. get through, is a waste of time. Whats the point of having to play so many games to work out who plays who in a top4 elimination.
well we had to give kemzs team games as they paid 30 bucks.... to play cs. so they needed to have games... double elim single map.... would of worked and we would of had plenty of time to do that, until burton decided to take admining the comp into his own hands.
at the end of the day.. how should that affect you guys from going to nationals? Apart from you thinking you would of won the autobirth, coming 2nd or 3rd. Did it really matter?
it does actually, because if iM came 1st 2 flights would of trickled down. as they have two players who live in Sydney. At the end of the day i could afford to go and jim was already going but the others needed financial assistance to go and we were denied any chance to go after that.
to use a matthew burton quote "i want a refund because i did not get what i paid for, you cant change the rules midway through... fair shake of the sauce bottle"
If it was more organised it would of been told in writing just like davestr1zl did for melbourne. Round Robin then a Bo1 double elim. Obviously nobody knew exactly what was happening from the start as they each players were obviously told different stories from 2 different people. Even if unpro was the only admin and gomez wasn't. Although I wasn't there so I can't say much it just seems that the decisions were made on the spot. It's none of my business anyway but I just think it doesn't hurt to make a article on ESAU/DICE with seeds/draw/layout.
stop having a sooky la la, dont like it? Place higher next tournament so there is no argument that you are the best in your state, what can you really expect in terms of organisation on such late notice from CBN, would you prefered to of had less teams show up instead of sylix making a concious effort to play? My team couldn't even attend, every team has suffered from this late notice..not just yours,
conz are u retarted? the compeition never ended? your a fucking down sydrome retard end urself. i would of preferred less teams if it meant getting what was paid for and promised. Im not going to drive 5 hours to play lan cs to play 3 games and pay 30 bucks.
chris, i played 2 competitive games and 2 16-1's i simplified it to match the amount of PC rental i used. we couldnt play bo3 because the other team didnt want to if they werent play for the invite?
Now ur logic is fucking stupid.we play top 2 becauese THERE IS ONLY PRIZES FOR FIRST.
HERE IS THE LOGIC SPELLED OUT FOR YOU WHICH WAS SAID YESTERDAY FIVE OR SIX TIMES
FIRST PLACE DEFENDS, SECOND PLACE ATTACKS AND DOES NOT DEFEND, THRID PLACE DOES NOT ATTACK BUT HAS TO DEFEND, FOURTH PLACE ATTACKS
WHY HAVE BO3 ANYWAY IF UR NOT GOING TO MAKE IT FAIR FOR ALL TEAMS IN CONTENTION FOR PRIZES
THERE IS A REASON WHY OVERSEAS COMPS DONT HAVE TEAMS WHO FINISH SECOND IN THEIR GROUP ONLY PLAY FOR 3/4 PRIZES
THE GROUP STAGE YOU DID HAD CLEAR SEEDINGS FOR EACH TEAM YET YOU STILL PLAYED A FINAL WHY ????
THE ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION IS WHY WE SHOULD HAVE HAD A CHANCE TO AT LEAST CHALLENGE THE SECOND PLACING TEAM AS THE PRIZE YOU GET FOR COMING SECOND IS BETTER THAN COMING THIRD
THIS WHOLE FUCKING MESS IS A DISGRACE BECAUSE YOU WOULD NOT LISTEN TO ARGUMENTS AND JUST DID WHAT BURTON SAID
I WANT A REFUND AS WHEN I PAID I WAS PROMISED TOP 4 WOULD BE PLAYING FINALS. I WOULD NOT OF PAID NOR TURNED UP OTHERWISE
vrs`deStiny: sponny you're the biggest nerd in aus and you smell like shit, Just quit cs so no1 has to hear your bs... At lan your like a statue behind his moniter not saying a word to anyone cause your just so fucken
so that little sped is aloud 2 talk crap 2 any1 he likes yet when I post something of negative content it gets nuked, mad. Did u sign a contract sponny when you entered the event that stipulates you can have your money back on so and so terms?
Not idea if I'm even on the right track but I think sponnys saying that when they placed 3rd in group they didnt have a choice but to play out to see who got 3rd/4th rather than having a chance to play out and have a chance at placing 1st/2nd like melb did where the format was changed on the day.
I think the issue was there was only one group where only top 2 played out for 1st/2nd in a bo3 and no one else had a chance to place higher where 3rd/4th only played a map. So match difference = non value for money?
Anyways glad to see we at least have a chance to send a team overseas! GL all!
pmuch but why should we have to defend our invite when we werent allowed to try and get the auto or 2nd invite? and why did iM get to play for an auotbirth just because they came second?
The issue is not so much the format played, but the fact Sponny had the idea going into the comp that top 4 would be playing off in finals to determine the placings and which teams received an auto.
Sponny was it an admin that told you this would be the format?
format was stated as top2 on the day, at least 10 times, Jim advised me we need a 3rd place (for invites) so i said 3 and 4th placed (from the groups) can play for the 3rd invite in bo3.
At no stage was the format going to be a 5 team round robin, then a 4 team single elim bo3.
It was always top2, just like the last 5 or so comps have been (which all feature around 4-7 teams).
And your argument about only counting games that were close ? so i suppose Ath can complain when they won those AGS comps only losing a total of 10 rounds all day...
You knew the comp had 5 teams, and u knew you would beat at least one of those easily, and you knew Elysium is always top2 (when a 5 team group is played).
Just because SniperDivision didn't want to play off for 3rd, that's still 4 games for $30. which is what is was for any given sunday #1 (which was 5 teams).
#47 thats not really relevant, considering in melbourne we've done top4 bo3 single-elim as finals for every single other comp of similar formats, but i deliberately made it bo1 double-elim for a national qualifier in order to get as accurate as possible 1st/2nd/3rd/4th placings.
I personally agree with sponny that the qld format, specifically the finals, wasnt good at all for a nats qual (if thats his argument, not really sure whats going on caus of all the bs), but its also unclear what the format was meant to be before the comp so i have nfi. If it was changed halfway through thats very bad, if it wasnt then oh well bl i guess whats done is done.
* Format: Pending team registrations, the most suitable qualification format will be decided closer to the event.
Meaning the admins covered them selves before the comp, no where in writing is the format Sponnys talking about stated. GoMeZ is saying Sponny was never told it would be the format he's arguing for and that it never changed.
If all that's true then Sponny can only argue that the competition format wasn't the best it could have been... What's new? You had the same chance as every one else to take an auto and didnt.
Your lieing chris that was not stated once at all till burton teared up.
Are you retarted we rush through our tside on d2 so we could get finals started cuz vin had to leave then we are told we arent playing finals because uve changed the structure.
Poor play chris, lieing to cover your tracks, just say sorry and move on.
4 teams did go to finals, the 3rd and 4th playoff is the consolation final.
It was always top2 for auto, 3rd and 4th for the final invite. Anyone who told you otherwise, wasn't in a position to say, since apparently i was the admin.
* Ghost talking is permitted. * Mwheel binding to duck is not permitted. * 32bit smoke is enforced and you will be DQ'd if you use anything otherwise * Flashbugging will incur a 3 round deduction. * Seedings will be announced, with map rotation, the Friday prior to the competition
Why is there a consolation final chris, that makes absolutely no sense as there needed be a way to distinguish 3rd place? but there was a way to distinguish 1st and 2nd place so why have the final? Where was the match to distinguish 2 and 3 place? there wasn't, why? because you couldn't do it in the time dynamics. This just further backs up the point that you changed the structure midway through because people had to leave?
4 teams did go to finals, no two teams did, we couldn't play anyway because we were in the same booth and you wouldnt move us because we were complaing about your shit decision.
* Seedings will be announced, with map rotation, the Friday prior to the competition
Never happened, i enquired as soon as i set up to what the method was, was told top 4 paid money played. Then you change it at the end of the day after we make concessions to speed the comp up. Thats fucking slack.
not that i really want to bother getting into this at all but in defense of gomez, I'd heard it was top4 1v4/2v3 etc from players before the tournie started, asked him, was informed it was 1v2 for inv/ab, 3v4 for inv etc cause needed full placings for trickle invites etc. (couldn't tell you if this was before the comp started or slightly into it but yeah, it wasn't deep in the comp or after group play cause we where worried we might of turded and not gotten the chance to play for the flights)
Paul read and you will gain knowledge, if i placed top two i wouldnt be complaining now as it would of been sorted on the day because we didnt have to go paul.
Your lieing chris and im not playing the next qualifier unless the administrators get their shit into gear. Biggest waste of time and money otherwise.
for all i know they aren't you are but. How else was i so certain that it was top 4 then ? Why did i think that from the moment i paid, till after groups finished?
Jim was meant to be admining, but he didn't do anyhting. * Seedings will be announced, with map rotation, the Friday prior to the competition
all that stuff was meant to be announced by jim. but that never happend. so u can't start blaming chris about that when he didn't announce stuff friday night when he didnt know he was admin the event until the morning of the event. thats when he told everyone what the deal was. (atleast we knew what was going on)
we (iM) were never under the impression that there was going to be another play off between the top 4 teams after the roundrobin.
after losing to burtons team, we really thought that we might not be able to secure the auto berth because if sponnys team infact beat burtons that would of resulted in a 3 way tie. we could of came 3rd due to round difference and we thought it was all over.
chris hasn't been lying about anything. all this weekend was, was a epic fail by jim (no offense). he was meant to be admining but didn't post like he was supposed to on the friday night. didn't do up the draw/maps like he was supposed to. chris took over and not everyone knew wtf was actually going on!
If I read this all correctly, then what Sponny is upset about is the fact that he thought the top four teams would be playing a standard single elim bo3 final (1v4, 2v3, winners play each other, losers play consolation for 3rd).
Instead the admin (whoever it was) simply took 1+2 and 3+4 from the day and had 1+2 play for an auto/invite (guaranteeing either team a spot to nationals) and had 3+4 play for an invite (giving them no shot at an auto).
m8 you of all people have no professionalism or class what so ever so stop acting like you are the mature 1 in this situation because your not. Fair enough if you wana make a point but the way you act is so fucken childish its not funny. All you do is sit your fat ass on your pc and talk shit. Im gona make you drop your nuts at this nats if you rock up.
1v2 and 3v4 as a final is a terrible way to run a qualifier final. Doesn't guarantee an accurate depiction of where teams should be seeded (in relevance to each other) and who should get an auto/invite.
Regardless of whether it was changed to suit one team's time constraints or not (which is terrible if it was), it's a bad way to hold a final.
It sounds like a misunderstanding between jim/gomez as to who was running it and what the format would be, and that jim has told sponny it would be a top4 double elim bo1 final (which makes sense given it's a qualifier), which makes it look like gomez has changed it at the last minute to suit burton's team.
But it would have probably all been avoided if CBN had been more competent in announcing qualifier dates and cluing in the people who were supposed to be running the qualifiers in the first place.
Yeh but what he means is that everyone knew unpro was the admin, he put up the news post, took the registrations, organised it etc, told sponny prior to the tournament the format would be whatever, then on the day of the tournament the format is changed by gomez, who he himself said he didnt even know he was adminning till 11am the morning of the comp.
from our pov, gomez brought in the scrim schedule and told our entire booth it was going to be a round robin 1v2 3v4.
@sponny the fact you're calling gomez a LAIR is fucking pathetic. the real reason youre kicking up shit is because youre a sore loser. if jim wasn't in the team you wouldn't have a leg to stand on. how does everyone find out it's 1v2 3v4 apart from your team? but keep lying yourself to make it look like you guys are in the right.
and to all. who really cares if sponny never attends another lan event ? absolutely no one.
contract law, purlease.. teams pay money to play in a competitive environment governed by rules. teams are invited to play knowing what the 30 dollars will get them. The organisers/admins in return take the money in exchange for providing a competitive environment with rules. if, at anytime decisions or actions are taken that a reasonable and normal person wouldn't do then it there is a breach of agreement - or contract.
which technically would allow a refund to occur or at least a pro-rata'd amount. (compensation)
things like talking when dead is different to making unreasonable decisions that effect ppl and affect the grounds for which teams enter into the competition.
sponny has a fair point if what he saying is true - comp changes for 1 person - burton. i used to kick up a fuss like sponny years ago, but cbf anymore, your say doesn't have any input unless you are running the comp (props to jim or whoever did).
btw, dave and bd are awesome admins and are reasonable and think logically - unlike that pathetic loser daveckster.
also, i really haven't read the above posts in detail, so if sponny is lying then gfu sponny..
nevertheless, what i said is a summary of contract law
plus, after playing yesterday, and the lack of teams, all you guys should be embracing old members like sponny, even though he may annoy most of you, he still is an active member of the community and hes one of those guys that i love to beat, without him there would be that little less satisfaction from playing cs.
hey kemz mate, im not a sore loser, and chris did lie. second of all at no point was our booth told about this until after groups. So its not just my team qmx are in the same boat. im not lieing about changing the rules for burton, if his team did not have to leave i would place even money on the comp not being run the way it was.
the people who are instantly dismissing sponny (first c0nz, now amuse) should probably understand that if sponny's telling the truth, he has a pretty valid point
look i'm gonna make one final post on the argument, then im willing to drop it.
The qual was a total shambles, i rocked up at 10:10 and was keen to watch some cs, at this point i didnt think i was admining. If you have ever seen my comps (like AGS / and ECN Nats) you would of instantly known this because i always bring 5 x sheets of paper with the draw on it and hand them out (1 per team). I also have a red bowl and pre typed up pieces of paper with maps on them.
I had none of this because nobody had told me i was running it. That includes both Jim, Elysium, WCG or CBN.
I intially said "standard elysium rules apply, round robin, top2 play off in a Bo3". Somebody corrected me, I think it was takita or burton i cannot be sure, but they said "you need 3 teams coz their is 3 spots".
I said, "fine then, 3rd and 4th can play off at the same time to decide the 3rd place invite".
At no stage did i ever say it would be a 1v4 2v3. At no stage did i change the tournament to suit burton (proven buy paul, yaman, and kurandus) who all agree i told them before the comp (or very early, maybe first round by the time i spoke to jus).
You make reference to "when you paid you were told" I was not even in elysium when you arrived, i was downstairs with JKS buying some breakfast, when i returned upstairs you were setting up in the booth. You also didnt hand me any money, for this comp you had to pay the Elysium Staff (Another reason why i thought i wasnt running it).
The whole idea of me changing my mind to suit Burton is ludicrous. I had Breakfast with JKS (your team mate) I consider Rory one of my closest CS friends (another team matr) and Jim to be my closest friend (in or out of CS). Why would i change the rules to suit burton over the above people mentioned.
(no offence to Matt, Vin, Lyndon, Paul, Tim - just trying to say i had mates in both teams, so favoritism didn't happen.)
It sounds to me like Jim has told you top4 (which explains why some of the qmx boys thought that as well.) Since you were in the same booth. But as Jim told me, and everyone else towards the middle of the day, Apparently i was the admin, so my ruling of top 2 stood.
And just so we are clear, i didnt lie, and anyone who attended the ECN can agree, i take my Admining very seriously.
The only apology i will give is that i wasnt very well prepared with seeds, draws and so forth, and know that "im sorry". But if you bothered to read this wall of text you would know why i didnt provide this.
Jimbo and Chriso give give give for your enjoyment and for no return and all cunts can do is sook. What the fuck was anyone doing sitting at home on a Friday night hitting F5 for hours on end in the hope of finding the draw for a computer game competition. Harden the fuck up nerds. Yaman and Sponny to co-host the next comp if there is one. Put in some work.
If i was in Sponny's position, i would also be upset. Having mearly a groupstage to determine the 2 top teams of the competition, is really not enough. It would be more practical, in the future, to have a longer competition format, so we may ruleout the top team. In saying that, i was also told the same thing by GoMeZ(His described competition format) at the start of the competition, as i used my initiative to gain the knowledge of how the comp would be ran.
Although you do make valid points sponny, and have the right to complain, you talk more shit than Sandra Sully getting bent over by Lexington Steel on Jamie Olivers kitchen bench. If more people liked you, more people would stick up for you. I think its time to put the forum keyboard away for a while, focus on your CS, and getting better at it. When i noticed i was getting better at CS, and worked out i was actually going to go somewhere, it was quite hard when most of the top players in the aus CS community thought i was a loaf of bread.
Start respecting people spondog, and you'll get the same respect back.
Poor admining cost me my chance at nationals at the end of the day and you know what this is actually the second time this has happened and you know what twice its been you chris. Im sick of it and this is my first personal post as regards how i feel about the issue. The other 20-25 posts ive made are purely for the NINE other people who uve done the same thing to. The only reason why this was not fixed on the day was due to Slyix's time constraints. Regardless of what anyone was told before hand and i may be wrong in saying you lied (I was told something completly different with that of the other NINE people in the same seating structure) BUT the lack of common sense being shown on Sunday and here is really poor.
Also when were u going to reseat us for our 3/4th playoff, you weren't purely because you didn't want us to complain.... Im sure if Qlimax knew it was only top 2 they wouldn't of wanted to play in the same booth in groups. I'm detecting a trend here and these aren't hard problems to fix if you wanted to but its quite clear you never did.....
Sponny, win a fucking game in groups and it won't be a problem will it, you filthy loner?
At the end of the day: your shit, noone else is whinging, so just shut the fuck up and take the hurt feelings about losing a computer game to the grave, son.
i did allow you to re-setup, in fact RORY DID re-setup at the burton PC's. It never eventuated because crate went home, and WCG says you cant use substitutes (as jim pointed out).
I was more than ok with you guys playing Sniper Division for 3rd. In fact i even told the girl on the counter that the tournament was still going even after iM had packed up.
time to build a bridge and get over it Sponf1re.....you should be proud of the fact that after 5 years you actually managed to qualify for a nationals and didn't rely on a hand me down invite
Glad to see you finally realise i didn't change the format. I'll cop it if you didn't like the format, even thought over half the competition thought it was reasonable. But that's fine, i had to make the decision on the spot at the start of the day and i stuck with it and didn't change it. Because after all i only found out i was running it at about 10:30.
If it was double elim (like sydney) you still would of been eliminated, since you did in fact lose to Burtons team and Immunity. I didn't rob you of your chance, you losing to burtons team and immunity did.
And this is the second time ive robbed you ? assuming your talking about ECN since that was the only national qualifier ive run. And you did end up playing for AG, even after your team kicked you.
that bloody yaman cunt is always crying up a storm in every thread i look in, fkn build a bridge and get over yourself bro your just a n00bie from juvie. pwnt.
ive been royally fucked over in my years of cs plenty of times, some have cost me matches, some have cost me a nats spot and some have even cost me a trip overseas. The point is shit happens and theres no point in blaming the shit out of chris and jim when they are 2 of the only people left who actually help the community. Without them there would be no nationals and there would be no comps.
second of all why would we play out AFTER everyone else has finished, its your responsibility to play the 3/4 final first anyway..
well chris you did because we did stuff we wouldnt of done if it wasnt groups but nice try. Nah you robbed as cold purely because you did a shit job admining. we rushed the whole t side to get finals quicker so they could go ??? Your fighting a losing argument im right on almost all counts, the only reason why this is an issue is a) people dont like me and b) your stubborn as fuck
Sponny shut the fuck up, nobody gives a flying fuck what you are saying. I see your untimely death being as you attempting to doggy paddle across a 5m stretch of water, unfortunately your weight lets you down and you drown in a puddle.
i didnt even admin the quals last year, my first comp was AnyGivenSunday...
i assume your talking about the MouseWheel thing with Sai. In which Incuban and Jim admin'd it. From memory Mike made a call on the day, and then talked to jim that night on vent or something and they made a post on ESAU the next day with the ruling.
Sponny:|"I thank jim and mike for coming to a conclusion about the matter"
that's what you said on the wcg09 thread about the sai thing. I didnt even admin it... wow you're so far off track it's not funny.
I dont even understand what your talking about now, making you rush ?
The only melbourne team will be my team. The only queensland team will be BurtoN's team and immunity if you count them as QLD. Then I'm assuming the rest will be given to the Sydney teams (although I've heard peki is giving away some wildcards to interested teams)
dw common sense is failing you once again, admining qld lan is a piece of piss and you fucked up and wont admit, like sure you did a GREAT job at ECN but u dropped the ball on the weekend yet wont admit it happy days.
Oh well, i genuinely hope someone does do it (offer up feedback and constructive criticism) because it needs to be done. They've fucked up this event royally 4 years running now, and somehow managed to even make it continually worse each year. I can't see them magically clueing up without being told what they're doing wrong, because they obviously dont realise that themselves yet.
IF ANYONE NEEDS A REPLACEMENT IM AVAILABLE JUST LET ME KNOW! IM IN SYD SO ITS EASY CHYEAAAAAAA GL TO ALL TEAMS ! THIS ONE IS GOING TO BE A CLOSE ONE GUYS!
I was thinking of writing detailed feedback but tbh I'm not really in a position to do it since I'm not really involved in admining these events and I cant be specific in saying what they need to improve on or what's being done wrong.
If theres a chance people will do stupid shit then delete my link since I cant edit my post.
just like to point out that currently at the WCG nordic finals there is a 5 team group, top 4 playing finals all with a chance for an auto. Think natu has to go soon though.
A) matthew burton's disguisting behavior today
B) Poor administration decisions on the day
C) CBN planning being outrageously terrible
D) Paying 30 dollars for 3 games of cs because one person had to leave because they had other commitments
E) My 3 hour drive home after playing 3 games with no chance of getting an autobirth because the structure of the comp was changed to suit one person after the group stages ended, and for that matter not completed properly in the first place
#1. Being shit prevented you from winning an autobirth.
#2. You're rejecting your invite because you're a broke ass nigger who can't afford a plane ticket.
#3. Noone wants to watch your retarded team get destroyed 16-0 by every other team attending.
the structure was changed from top 4 playing for prizes to top 2 due to one players time constraints
Also im going to defend jim here, at no point does jim do anything with regards to admining cs comps for personal gain. Jim would make a call based on the common sense at the time, which yesterday was ignored by people whose interests were best served by doing their own thing (yes they lived the game themselves before discussions had concluded because they had a player leaving). In my view finals where never played as they weren't actually finals, either the finals have to be replayed or you take the standings from groups, burtons team getting the auto. This really should be fixed by the community, because really it stinks and teams should not be rewarded for being fuckheads or at next lan comp i will rock up when i feel like, win one game, leave because i got shit to do? and claim entitlements to win the whole competition.
makes you appreciate nats like the ECN/dicevip nats, etc :)
please say it is
nvm says 24th of july, saturday
We needed a 3rd place so i said just make 3rd and 4th play off for 3rd (playing off bo3).
having 4 teams, playing round robin, then saying top4 single elim bo3, is just ridiculous. What was the point of the roundrobin.
we had 1 group of 5, and from that the top2 went through to the elimination bracket, which is pretty much what most tournaments do these days.
PS, i didnt know i was running the event to about 11:00am on the day of the comp :(
Now ur logic is fucking stupid.we play top 2 becauese THERE IS ONLY PRIZES FOR FIRST.
HERE IS THE LOGIC SPELLED OUT FOR YOU WHICH WAS SAID YESTERDAY FIVE OR SIX TIMES
FIRST PLACE DEFENDS, SECOND PLACE ATTACKS AND DOES NOT DEFEND, THRID PLACE DOES NOT ATTACK BUT HAS TO DEFEND, FOURTH PLACE ATTACKS
WHY HAVE BO3 ANYWAY IF UR NOT GOING TO MAKE IT FAIR FOR ALL TEAMS IN CONTENTION FOR PRIZES
THERE IS A REASON WHY OVERSEAS COMPS DONT HAVE TEAMS WHO FINISH SECOND IN THEIR GROUP ONLY PLAY FOR 3/4 PRIZES
THE GROUP STAGE YOU DID HAD CLEAR SEEDINGS FOR EACH TEAM YET YOU STILL PLAYED A FINAL WHY ????
THE ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION IS WHY WE SHOULD HAVE HAD A CHANCE TO AT LEAST CHALLENGE THE SECOND PLACING TEAM AS THE PRIZE YOU GET FOR COMING SECOND IS BETTER THAN COMING THIRD
THIS WHOLE FUCKING MESS IS A DISGRACE BECAUSE YOU WOULD NOT LISTEN TO ARGUMENTS AND JUST DID WHAT BURTON SAID
I WANT A REFUND AS WHEN I PAID I WAS PROMISED TOP 4 WOULD BE PLAYING FINALS. I WOULD NOT OF PAID NOR TURNED UP OTHERWISE
roar
I think the issue was there was only one group where only top 2 played out for 1st/2nd in a bo3 and no one else had a chance to place higher where 3rd/4th only played a map. So match difference = non value for money?
Anyways glad to see we at least have a chance to send a team overseas! GL all!
Sponny was it an admin that told you this would be the format?
Any Given Sunday #1
Any Given Sunday #2
ECN Qualifier #1
ECN Qualifier #2
ECN Qualifier #3
yerp
At no stage was the format going to be a 5 team round robin, then a 4 team single elim bo3.
It was always top2, just like the last 5 or so comps have been (which all feature around 4-7 teams).
And your argument about only counting games that were close ? so i suppose Ath can complain when they won those AGS comps only losing a total of 10 rounds all day...
You knew the comp had 5 teams, and u knew you would beat at least one of those easily, and you knew Elysium is always top2 (when a 5 team group is played).
Just because SniperDivision didn't want to play off for 3rd, that's still 4 games for $30. which is what is was for any given sunday #1 (which was 5 teams).
If you didn't want to play, nobody forced you.
I personally agree with sponny that the qld format, specifically the finals, wasnt good at all for a nats qual (if thats his argument, not really sure whats going on caus of all the bs), but its also unclear what the format was meant to be before the comp so i have nfi. If it was changed halfway through thats very bad, if it wasnt then oh well bl i guess whats done is done.
If it was double elim, sponny still would of come 3rd or 4th.
1st loss to burton's team, second loss to immunity.
You wanted 3 lives, for a comp that had 5 teams...
* Format: Pending team registrations, the most suitable qualification format will be decided closer to the event.
Meaning the admins covered them selves before the comp, no where in writing is the format Sponnys talking about stated. GoMeZ is saying Sponny was never told it would be the format he's arguing for and that it never changed.
If all that's true then Sponny can only argue that the competition format wasn't the best it could have been... What's new? You had the same chance as every one else to take an auto and didnt.
Nick its irrelevant also because there are 3 prizes not 1 this time.
Are you retarted we rush through our tside on d2 so we could get finals started cuz vin had to leave then we are told we arent playing finals because uve changed the structure.
Poor play chris, lieing to cover your tracks, just say sorry and move on.
It was always top2 for auto, 3rd and 4th for the final invite. Anyone who told you otherwise, wasn't in a position to say, since apparently i was the admin.
* Ghost talking is permitted.
* Mwheel binding to duck is not permitted.
* 32bit smoke is enforced and you will be DQ'd if you use anything otherwise
* Flashbugging will incur a 3 round deduction.
* Seedings will be announced, with map rotation, the Friday prior to the competition
4 teams did go to finals, no two teams did, we couldn't play anyway because we were in the same booth and you wouldnt move us because we were complaing about your shit decision.
Never happened, i enquired as soon as i set up to what the method was, was told top 4 paid money played. Then you change it at the end of the day after we make concessions to speed the comp up. Thats fucking slack.
At this point I didn't even realise there were more than 2 spots, and at this point Chris explained that 3-4 would play off for the 3rd invite.
If you had placed top2 you wouldn't even be complaining.
:|
Your lieing chris and im not playing the next qualifier unless the administrators get their shit into gear. Biggest waste of time and money otherwise.
fuck
* Seedings will be announced, with map rotation, the Friday prior to the competition
all that stuff was meant to be announced by jim. but that never happend. so u can't start blaming chris about that when he didn't announce stuff friday night when he didnt know he was admin the event until the morning of the event. thats when he told everyone what the deal was. (atleast we knew what was going on)
we (iM) were never under the impression that there was going to be another play off between the top 4 teams after the roundrobin.
after losing to burtons team, we really thought that we might not be able to secure the auto berth because if sponnys team infact beat burtons that would of resulted in a 3 way tie. we could of came 3rd due to round difference and we thought it was all over.
chris hasn't been lying about anything. all this weekend was, was a epic fail by jim (no offense). he was meant to be admining but didn't post like he was supposed to on the friday night. didn't do up the draw/maps like he was supposed to. chris took over and not everyone knew wtf was actually going on!
Instead the admin (whoever it was) simply took 1+2 and 3+4 from the day and had 1+2 play for an auto/invite (guaranteeing either team a spot to nationals) and had 3+4 play for an invite (giving them no shot at an auto).
RIVETING TALE CHAP.
fk off sponny
Yeah sorry conz for wanting a bit of professionalism in a competitive game. go listen to gh3 at your next cs comp for all i care.
Regardless of whether it was changed to suit one team's time constraints or not (which is terrible if it was), it's a bad way to hold a final.
It sounds like a misunderstanding between jim/gomez as to who was running it and what the format would be, and that jim has told sponny it would be a top4 double elim bo1 final (which makes sense given it's a qualifier), which makes it look like gomez has changed it at the last minute to suit burton's team.
except for the fact GoMeZ told people prior to the first game (and prior to him knowing about burtons issue) that the format would be 1v2, 3v4.
Dave explained the rest.
@sponny
the fact you're calling gomez a LAIR is fucking pathetic. the real reason youre kicking up shit is because youre a sore loser. if jim wasn't in the team you wouldn't have a leg to stand on. how does everyone find out it's 1v2 3v4 apart from your team? but keep lying yourself to make it look like you guys are in the right.
and to all. who really cares if sponny never attends another lan event ? absolutely no one.
which technically would allow a refund to occur or at least a pro-rata'd amount. (compensation)
things like talking when dead is different to making unreasonable decisions that effect ppl and affect the grounds for which teams enter into the competition.
sponny has a fair point if what he saying is true - comp changes for 1 person - burton. i used to kick up a fuss like sponny years ago, but cbf anymore, your say doesn't have any input unless you are running the comp (props to jim or whoever did).
btw, dave and bd are awesome admins and are reasonable and think logically - unlike that pathetic loser daveckster.
nevertheless, what i said is a summary of contract law
plus, after playing yesterday, and the lack of teams, all you guys should be embracing old members like sponny, even though he may annoy most of you, he still is an active member of the community and hes one of those guys that i love to beat, without him there would be that little less satisfaction from playing cs.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6JuN0AslcM
The qual was a total shambles, i rocked up at 10:10 and was keen to watch some cs, at this point i didnt think i was admining. If you have ever seen my comps (like AGS / and ECN Nats) you would of instantly known this because i always bring 5 x sheets of paper with the draw on it and hand them out (1 per team). I also have a red bowl and pre typed up pieces of paper with maps on them.
I had none of this because nobody had told me i was running it. That includes both Jim, Elysium, WCG or CBN.
I intially said "standard elysium rules apply, round robin, top2 play off in a Bo3". Somebody corrected me, I think it was takita or burton i cannot be sure, but they said "you need 3 teams coz their is 3 spots".
I said, "fine then, 3rd and 4th can play off at the same time to decide the 3rd place invite".
At no stage did i ever say it would be a 1v4 2v3. At no stage did i change the tournament to suit burton (proven buy paul, yaman, and kurandus) who all agree i told them before the comp (or very early, maybe first round by the time i spoke to jus).
You make reference to "when you paid you were told" I was not even in elysium when you arrived, i was downstairs with JKS buying some breakfast, when i returned upstairs you were setting up in the booth. You also didnt hand me any money, for this comp you had to pay the Elysium Staff (Another reason why i thought i wasnt running it).
The whole idea of me changing my mind to suit Burton is ludicrous. I had Breakfast with JKS (your team mate) I consider Rory one of my closest CS friends (another team matr) and Jim to be my closest friend (in or out of CS). Why would i change the rules to suit burton over the above people mentioned.
(no offence to Matt, Vin, Lyndon, Paul, Tim - just trying to say i had mates in both teams, so favoritism didn't happen.)
It sounds to me like Jim has told you top4 (which explains why some of the qmx boys thought that as well.) Since you were in the same booth. But as Jim told me, and everyone else towards the middle of the day, Apparently i was the admin, so my ruling of top 2 stood.
And just so we are clear, i didnt lie, and anyone who attended the ECN can agree, i take my Admining very seriously.
The only apology i will give is that i wasnt very well prepared with seeds, draws and so forth, and know that "im sorry". But if you bothered to read this wall of text you would know why i didnt provide this.
"Didn't do anything"
And nor should I given that I cop nothing but snide shit from you all the time Yaman.
Maybe you can show us the light by bending over guiding us with that sun that shines so brightly from your ass.
Although you do make valid points sponny, and have the right to complain, you talk more shit than Sandra Sully getting bent over by Lexington Steel on Jamie Olivers kitchen bench. If more people liked you, more people would stick up for you. I think its time to put the forum keyboard away for a while, focus on your CS, and getting better at it. When i noticed i was getting better at CS, and worked out i was actually going to go somewhere, it was quite hard when most of the top players in the aus CS community thought i was a loaf of bread.
Start respecting people spondog, and you'll get the same respect back.
Also when were u going to reseat us for our 3/4th playoff, you weren't purely because you didn't want us to complain.... Im sure if Qlimax knew it was only top 2 they wouldn't of wanted to play in the same booth in groups. I'm detecting a trend here and these aren't hard problems to fix if you wanted to but its quite clear you never did.....
At the end of the day: your shit, noone else is whinging, so just shut the fuck up and take the hurt feelings about losing a computer game to the grave, son.
I was more than ok with you guys playing Sniper Division for 3rd. In fact i even told the girl on the counter that the tournament was still going even after iM had packed up.
If it was double elim (like sydney) you still would of been eliminated, since you did in fact lose to Burtons team and Immunity. I didn't rob you of your chance, you losing to burtons team and immunity did.
And this is the second time ive robbed you ? assuming your talking about ECN since that was the only national qualifier ive run. And you did end up playing for AG, even after your team kicked you.
ive been royally fucked over in my years of cs plenty of times, some have cost me matches, some have cost me a nats spot and some have even cost me a trip overseas. The point is shit happens and theres no point in blaming the shit out of chris and jim when they are 2 of the only people left who actually help the community. Without them there would be no nationals and there would be no comps.
second of all why would we play out AFTER everyone else has finished, its your responsibility to play the 3/4 final first anyway..
well chris you did because we did stuff we wouldnt of done if it wasnt groups but nice try. Nah you robbed as cold purely because you did a shit job admining. we rushed the whole t side to get finals quicker so they could go ??? Your fighting a losing argument im right on almost all counts, the only reason why this is an issue is a) people dont like me and b) your stubborn as fuck
i assume your talking about the MouseWheel thing with Sai. In which Incuban and Jim admin'd it. From memory Mike made a call on the day, and then talked to jim that night on vent or something and they made a post on ESAU the next day with the ruling.
Sponny:|"I thank jim and mike for coming to a conclusion about the matter"
that's what you said on the wcg09 thread about the sai thing. I didnt even admin it... wow you're so far off track it's not funny.
I dont even understand what your talking about now, making you rush ?
any idea on how many teams are actually coming and what the schedule will be? Vikings are attending
I think jim is sorting that out asap.
The only melbourne team will be my team.
The only queensland team will be BurtoN's team and immunity if you count them as QLD.
Then I'm assuming the rest will be given to the Sydney teams (although I've heard peki is giving away some wildcards to interested teams)
plus if people dont accept the invite does that mean trickle down from NSW qual?
because lets say
QLD
1.iM
2.burton
vic
1.KBS
nsw
1.arch
2.96
3.vikings
4.crazy
[zk]
[vp]
[eS]
The World Cyber Games Australian grand final dates is being held this weekend. Here are the details:
Sydney
Beyond LAN Cafe
Lower Ground Floor
505 George St
Sydney
July 17-18
10am Start
good dates -.-
http://www.charliesblog.com.au/index.php?option=com_blogcontact&Itemid=65
by phone or email, there's the link.
If theres a chance people will do stupid shit then delete my link since I cant edit my post.
gomez is also correct about it being mike who made the decision RE sai's mwheeling (boy did i blow up that day :$)
tbh gomez is a top admin, everyone has off days (esp if he didnt know he was running it)